Husqvarna 350BT VS Stihl BR 200 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Husqvarna 350BT and the Stihl BR 200.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Husqvarna 350BT	Stihl BR 200

Higher CFM Higher MPH Bigger fuel tank Bigger engine	Lighter Less noisy Less expensive
Buy on Amazon	Show Buying Options
Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Because the Stihl BR 200 and the Husqvarna 350BT are produced by separate manufacturers, there might be differences in their overall design and technological implementation. You'll find the throttle positioned on the tube of both products, ensuring that your left hand remains unoccupied for other activities.
Engineered as backpack blowers, these two products feature sizeable engines and large fuel tanks, ensuring comfortable carrying during operation.
Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.

Comparatively, the Husqvarna 350BT boasts a CFM of 494.41, surpassing the 400 CFM of the Stihl BR 200, positioning it as the more effective choice for clearing leaves in a shorter amount of time.
With an MPH of 180, the Husqvarna 350BT moderately surpasses the 150 MPH of the Stihl BR 200, offering slightly superior airspeed for enhanced performance in blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris and wet leaves.

At 22.5 lbs, the Husqvarna 350BT noticeably outweighs the 12.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 200, possibly leading to increased user fatigue and necessitating more effort to operate effectively.
The Husqvarna 350BT emits noise at 94 dB, markedly louder than the 70 dB of the Stihl BR 200. As a result, using the latter will be noticeably gentler on your ears and less likely to disrupt your neighbors.

The Husqvarna 350BT features a larger fuel tank, offering 42.27 fl.oz. compared to the 35.5 fl.oz. of the Stihl BR 200. As a result, you have the advantage of storing more fuel, potentially extending runtime, assuming similar fuel consumption rates for their engines.
The engine displacement of the Stihl BR 200, at 27.2cc, pales in comparison to the 50.2cc of the Husqvarna 350BT. As a result, the latter may consume notably more fuel per stroke, resulting in significantly enhanced power.
These leaf blowers are both powered by 2-cycle engines, requiring an oil/fuel mix to function.