WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

RedMax EBZ5150 vs Husqvarna 350BT - The Differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Husqvarna 350BT and the RedMax EBZ5150.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Husqvarna 350BTRedMax EBZ5150
Husqvarna 350BTRedMax EBZ5150
  • Tube throttle
  • Higher CFM
  • Hip throttle
  • Higher MPH
  • Lighter
  • Less noisy
  • Bigger fuel tank

Feel, Fuel & Noise

As the RedMax EBZ5150 and the Husqvarna 350BT share the same manufacturer (RedMax is a Husqvarna brand), they benefit from the same overall level of quality and attention to detail.

  • These two products are constructed as backpack blowers, allowing you to comfortably carry their big engines and massive fuel tanks. Opting for the EBZ5150 gives you a hip throttle, while the 350BT comes with a throttle conveniently placed on the blower tube, allowing for hand-free operation. Deciding between the two depends on your preference for accessibility or operational flexibility.
  • gas-powered blowers, both products offer a dependable power source that can be refilled quickly, allowing you the mobility to cover extensive outdoor spaces without interruption.
  • Weighing 22.5 lbs, the Husqvarna 350BT is a bit heavier than the RedMax EBZ5150 at 20.7 lbs, so users sensitive to weight might find the lighter option slightly more comfortable.
  • The Husqvarna 350BT registers a noise rating of 94 dB, slightly above the 89 dB rating of the RedMax EBZ5150. Opting for the RedMax EBZ5150 could result in a quieter experience for both you and your neighbors.

CFM & MPH

  • In contrast, the Husqvarna 350BT, with its CFM of 494.41, outperforms the 434 CFM of the RedMax EBZ5150, making it the preferred option for efficiently blowing leaves away.
  • The RedMax EBZ5150, with an MPH of 215, modestly outpaces the 180 MPH of the Husqvarna 350BT, ensuring slightly quicker air expulsion for more efficient leaf blowing and debris lifting.

Engine specs

  • With its generous 70.9 fl.oz. fuel tank, the RedMax EBZ5150 outstrips the Husqvarna 350BT, which holds 42.27 fl.oz. of fuel. This disparity means more fuel available for longer runtime, assuming comparable fuel consumption rates between the two engines. The lower fuel tank capacity of the Husqvarna 350BT can be accounted for by its Handheld handling. In contrast, the RedMax EBZ5150's backpack design allows you to comfortably carry a larger fuel tank’s weight and dimensions.
  • With matching engine displacements of 50.2 cc, these products likely share similar fuel consumption rates per stroke, translating to comparable performance levels. Both of these leaf blowers are equipped with 2-stroke engines, meaning they require an oil/fuel mix for operation.

Other features

  • Both the Husqvarna 350BT and the RedMax EBZ5150 lack leaf vacuuming features, meaning you'll need to employ another method for leaf collection.

TL;DR

Husqvarna 350BTRedMax EBZ5150
Husqvarna 350BTRedMax EBZ5150
  • Tube throttle
  • Higher CFM
  • Hip throttle
  • Higher MPH
  • Lighter
  • Less noisy
  • Bigger fuel tank

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0