Husqvarna 150BT VS Stihl BR 600 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Husqvarna 150BT and the Stihl BR 600.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Husqvarna 150BT	Stihl BR 600

Higher MPH Far less expensive	Higher CFM Lighter Less noisy Bigger fuel tank Bigger engine 4-Mix engine
Buy on Amazon	Show Buying Options
Show all offers

Common specs comparison

As the Stihl BR 600 and the Husqvarna 150BT do not share the same manufacturer, their overall build and technology in use can vary. You'll find the throttle positioned on the tube of both products, ensuring that your left hand remains unoccupied for other activities.
Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work.
Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.

In direct comparison, the Stihl BR 600, equipped with a CFM of 677, outshines the 452 CFM of the Husqvarna 150BT. Expect a remarkable upgrade in leaf blowing performance with the Stihl BR 600, as it delivers significantly greater airflow for quicker and more effective leaf removal.
The MPH of the Husqvarna 150BT, at 270, modestly exceeds the 238 MPH of the Stihl BR 600, allowing it to blow leaves on grass or lift heavy debris (acorns, etc.) and wet leaves more effectively.

At 22 lbs, the Husqvarna 150BT just slightly outweighs the 21.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 600, potentially offering a touch more comfort in handling.
The Husqvarna 150BT emits noise at 94 dB, markedly louder than the 75 dB of the Stihl BR 600. As a result, using the latter will be noticeably gentler on your ears and less likely to disrupt your neighbors.

The Stihl BR 600 features a larger fuel tank, offering 47.3 fl.oz. compared to the 42.6 fl.oz. of the Husqvarna 150BT. As a result, you have the advantage of storing more fuel, potentially extending runtime, assuming similar fuel consumption rates for their engines.
The Husqvarna 150BT's engine, with a displacement of 51cc, is smaller than the 64.8cc engine of the Stihl BR 600. This implies that the latter might require more fuel per stroke, thus delivering higher power.
Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the Husqvarna 150BT features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 600 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.