Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III and the Stihl BR 700.
But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:
Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III | Stihl BR 700 |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Buy on Amazon | Show Buying Options |
Show all offers |
Common specs comparison
Make & handling
- Since the Stihl BR 700 and the Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III are made by different manufacturers, you may find variations in their overall construction and the technology employed. Both products have their throttle located on the tube of the blower, which allows you to keep your left hand free.
- Designed as backpack blowers, both products boast substantial engines and sizable fuel tanks, making them easy to carry for extended periods.
- Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.
CFM & MPH
- The Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III with a CFM of 1000 slightly exceeds the 912 CFM of the Stihl BR 700. Thus, in comparison, you may find that the former is able to move more leaves per minute.
- The Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III, with an MPH of 220, modestly outpaces the 197 MPH of the Stihl BR 700, ensuring slightly quicker air expulsion for more efficient leaf blowing and debris lifting.
Weight & Noise rating
- At 26.8 lbs, the Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III exceeds the 23.4 lbs of the Stihl BR 700, resulting in a heavier load for users and potentially leading to more fatigue over prolonged usage.
- With a noise level of 106 dB, the Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III generates considerably more sound than the 75 dB of the Stihl BR 700. Opting for the latter will offer a significantly quieter experience for you and reduce potential disturbance to nearby residents.
Engine specs comparison
- With its generous 87.9 fl.oz. fuel tank, the Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III outstrips the Stihl BR 700, which holds 47.3 fl.oz. of fuel. This disparity means more fuel available for longer runtime, assuming comparable fuel consumption rates between the two engines.
- Comparatively, the Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III boasts an engine displacement of 75.6cc, surpassing the 64.8cc of the Stihl BR 700. As a result, it could use more fuel per stroke, offering increased power output.
- Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 700 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.
Other features comparison
Vacuum ability
Neither the Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III nor the Stihl BR 700 has the ability to vacuum leaves. Thus, you will require another method of leaf collection.
TL;DR
Husqvarna 580BTS Mark III | Stihl BR 700 |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Buy on Amazon | Show Buying Options |
Show all offers |