WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Husqvarna 570BTS vs 560BTS - The Differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Husqvarna 560BTS and the Husqvarna 570BTS.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Husqvarna 560BTS	Husqvarna 570BTS

Lighter Less noisy Less expensive	Higher CFM Higher MPH
$459.99 on eBay	Buy on Amazon

Feel, Fuel & Noise

Belonging to the line of Husqvarna blowers, both the 560BTS and the 570BTS should have a shared standard of manufacturing and attention to detail.

Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work. The throttle for both products is conveniently placed on the blower's tube, freeing up your left hand for other tasks.
Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.
The weight of the Husqvarna 570BTS, at 24.7 lbs, slightly exceeds that of the 23.25 lbs Husqvarna 560BTS, which means you may experience slightly less fatigue and find it easier to maneuver during prolonged use.
Though the difference in noise levels between the Husqvarna 570BTS, rating 99 dB, and the Husqvarna 560BTS, standing at 97 dB, may seem insignificant, it could affect both the operator's comfort and nearby residents' tranquility.

CFM & MPH

Comparatively, the Husqvarna 570BTS boasts a CFM of 768, surpassing the 631 CFM of the Husqvarna 560BTS, positioning it as the more effective choice for clearing leaves in a shorter amount of time.
The Husqvarna 570BTS with an MPH of 236 slightly exceeds the 232 MPH of the Husqvarna 560BTS. Thus, in comparison, the former expels air at a slightly higher speed, and should do a better job at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet leaves and debris (acorns, etc.).

Engine specs

With matching fuel tank capacities of 74.4 fl.oz., both devices will need refilling at comparable rates.
These two products feature engine displacements that are virtually the same, implying that their fuel consumption per stroke and overall performance should be closely matched. With 2-stroke engines, both leaf blowers mandate an oil/fuel mix as part of their operation.