Husqvarna 525BX VS Echo PB-2620 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Husqvarna 525BX and the Echo PB-2620.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Husqvarna 525BX	Echo PB-2620

Higher CFM Higher MPH Lighter	Less noisy Bigger fuel tank
$269.99 on eBay	Buy on Amazon
Show all offers	Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Since the Echo PB-2620 and the Husqvarna 525BX are made by different manufacturers, you may find variations in their overall construction and the technology employed.
Being handheld blowers, these two products ensure exceptional mobility while in use.
Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.

The Husqvarna 525BX boasts a slightly higher CFM rating of 459 compared to the Echo PB-2620 (456 CFM), suggesting it may have a slight advantage in leaf-moving power.
The Husqvarna 525BX with an MPH of 192 slightly exceeds the 172 MPH of the Echo PB-2620. Thus, in comparison, the former expels air at a slightly higher speed, and should do a better job at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet leaves and debris (acorns, etc.).

The Echo PB-2620, weighing 9.7 lbs, edges slightly above the 9.48 lbs of the Husqvarna 525BX, implying that while it's marginally heavier, you may notice a tad more comfort and ease in handling the latter.
The Husqvarna 525BX emits a noise level of 91 dB, significantly louder than the 70 dB of the Echo PB-2620. This difference means that the latter will provide a much quieter experience for you and be less likely to disturb your neighbors.

With its generous 20.3 fl.oz. fuel tank, the Echo PB-2620 outstrips the Husqvarna 525BX, which holds 15.22 fl.oz. of fuel. This disparity means more fuel available for longer runtime, assuming comparable fuel consumption rates between the two engines.
These two products share an engine displacement of 25.4cc, suggesting they might consume comparable amounts of fuel per stroke, potentially resulting in similar performance outputs.
With 2-cycle engines, both leaf blowers mandate an oil/fuel mix as part of their operation.