WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Stihl BG 86 vs BG 56 C-E - The differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BG 56 C-E and the Stihl BG 86.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86
Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86
  • Easy2Start technology
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Significantly less expensive
  • Higher CFM
  • Higher MPH

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

  • Belonging to the line of Stihl blowers, both the BG 56 C-E and the BG 86 should have a shared standard of manufacturing and attention to detail. However, the Stihl BG 56 C-E features the Easy2Start technology.
  • Being handheld blowers, these two products ensure exceptional mobility while in use.
  • Both products, gas blowers, offer a swift refill system, saving you time on refueling and allowing you to efficiently manage large outdoor spaces.

CFM & MPH

  • While the difference is slight, the Stihl BG 86's CFM rating of 444 marginally outpaces the 412 CFM of the Stihl BG 56 C-E, potentially resulting in a subtle improvement in leaf-clearing performance.
  • With an MPH of 190, the Stihl BG 86 moderately surpasses the 159 MPH of the Stihl BG 56 C-E, offering slightly superior airspeed for enhanced performance in blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris and wet leaves.

Weight & Noise rating

  • The weight of the Stihl BG 86, at 9.7 lbs, slightly exceeds that of the 9.3 lbs Stihl BG 56 C-E, which means you may experience slightly less fatigue and find it easier to maneuver during prolonged use.
  • At 70 dB, both devices are equally neighbor-friendly, ensuring that neither would cause undue disturbance, and equally gentle on your ears during operation.

Engine specs comparison

  • With a fuel tank volume of 18.3 fl.oz., the Stihl BG 56 C-E outshines the Stihl BG 86, which holds 14.9 fl.oz. This enables you to carry more fuel, offering the possibility of longer operation, provided the engines consume fuel at comparable rates.
  • These two products share an engine displacement of 27.2cc, suggesting they might consume comparable amounts of fuel per stroke, potentially resulting in similar performance outputs.
  • These leaf blowers are both powered by 2-cycle engines, requiring an oil/fuel mix to function.

Other features comparison

Vacuum ability

Both products offer the functionality of a leaf vacuum, granting users a hassle-free and cleaner approach to leaf cleanup. This versatile feature enables users to effortlessly transition between blowing and vacuuming modes, streamlining outdoor maintenance tasks.

TL;DR

Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86
Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86
  • Easy2Start technology
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Significantly less expensive
  • Higher CFM
  • Higher MPH
2 Comments
  1. Seems like there is more to know in this comparison as they are too similar to justify the much higher price of the 86. Maybe the 86 is easier/less expensive to repair, such as a top-end rebuild?

    • Yeah this fails to mention the 86’s anti-vibration system and lock on throttle.. two items that would be a consideration for professionals who would use this for many more hours per day than the homeowner…

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0