WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Stihl BG 86 vs BG 56 C-E - The Differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BG 56 C-E and the Stihl BG 86.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86
Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86
  • Higher CFM
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Significantly less expensive
  • Higher MPH

Feel, Fuel & Noise

Manufactured by Stihl, both the BG 56 C-E and the BG 86 should uphold similar standards of quality and attention to detail.

  • Since both products are handheld blowers, they offer excellent mobility for your convenience.
  • Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.
  • The Stihl BG 86's 9.7-lb weight is very close to the 9.3 lbs of the Stihl BG 56 C-E, meaning comfort, handling, and fatigue should be almost identical between the two.
  • With a noise rating of 70 dB for both devices, you can expect them to be equally considerate of your neighbors and equally comfortable for you to use.

CFM & MPH

  • In comparison, the Stihl BG 56 C-E, with a CFM of 412, beats the 365 CFM of the Stihl BG 86, making it the superior landscaping tool of the two, when it comes to the amount of leaves that can be blown per minute.
  • The Stihl BG 86, with an MPH of 190, modestly outpaces the 159 MPH of the Stihl BG 56 C-E, ensuring slightly quicker air expulsion for more efficient leaf blowing and debris lifting.

Engine specs

  • With a fuel tank volume of 18.3 fl.oz., the Stihl BG 56 C-E outshines the Stihl BG 86, which holds 14.9 fl.oz. This enables you to carry more fuel, offering the possibility of longer operation, provided the engines consume fuel at comparable rates.
  • Both products boast an engine displacement of 27.2 cc, hinting at similar fuel consumption rates per stroke and potentially yielding comparable performance outcomes. Both of these leaf blowers are equipped with 2-stroke engines, meaning they require an oil/fuel mix for operation.

Other features

  • Both products can be used as leaf vacuums, providing users with a convenient and less messy method of leaf disposal. The versatility allows users to seamlessly switch between blowing and vacuuming modes, simplifying yard work.

TL;DR

Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86
Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86
  • Higher CFM
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Significantly less expensive
  • Higher MPH
2 Comments
  1. Seems like there is more to know in this comparison as they are too similar to justify the much higher price of the 86. Maybe the 86 is easier/less expensive to repair, such as a top-end rebuild?

    • Yeah this fails to mention the 86’s anti-vibration system and lock on throttle.. two items that would be a consideration for professionals who would use this for many more hours per day than the homeowner…

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0