WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Stihl BG 86 C-E vs BG 56 C-E - The Differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BG 56 C-E and the Stihl BG 86 C-E.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86 C-E
Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86 C-E
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Far less expensive
  • Higher CFM
  • Higher MPH

Feel, Fuel & Noise

As the BG 56 C-E and the BG 86 C-E are both Stihl blowers, they benefit from the same level of quality and attention to detail.

  • As handheld blowers, both products grant you superior maneuverability wherever you need to work.
  • Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.
  • The Stihl BG 86 C-E, at 9.9 lbs, is only slightly heavier than the Stihl BG 56 C-E at 9.3 lbs, so most users should experience very similar comfort and handling from both.
  • Both devices maintain a noise level of 70 dB, ensuring they're equally respectful of your neighbors' peace and equally pleasant for you to operate without excessive noise.

CFM & MPH

  • The Stihl BG 86 C-E boasts a slightly higher CFM rating of 444 compared to the Stihl BG 56 C-E (412 CFM), suggesting it may have a slight advantage in leaf-moving power.
  • With an MPH of 190, the Stihl BG 86 C-E moderately surpasses the 159 MPH of the Stihl BG 56 C-E, offering slightly superior airspeed for enhanced performance in blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris and wet leaves.

Engine specs

  • The Stihl BG 56 C-E features a larger fuel tank, offering 18.3 fl.oz. compared to the 14.9 fl.oz. of the Stihl BG 86 C-E. As a result, you have the advantage of storing more fuel, potentially extending runtime, assuming similar fuel consumption rates for their engines.
  • The engine displacement of 27.2 cc in both products indicates similar fuel consumption per stroke, potentially leading to equivalent performance capabilities. Both leaf blowers come with 2-stroke engines, which necessitate an oil/fuel mix for operation.

Other features

  • Equipped with leaf vacuuming capabilities, both products offer users a practical and mess-free method for leaf disposal. This dual-functionality allows users to seamlessly alternate between blowing and vacuuming modes, making yard work more convenient and efficient.

TL;DR

Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86 C-E
Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86 C-E
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Far less expensive
  • Higher CFM
  • Higher MPH
1 Comment
  1. I have a 20 year old BG56 and just bought a BG86 thinking i would have more power. I know the specs reflect that but in the real world I think my 20+ yo BG56 out performs the new one. The difference in real life performance is not worth the hundreds more for the 86. This is a money grab for Stihl. I will reconsider before i buy another Stihl product.

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0