WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Stihl BG 86 C-E vs BG 56 C-E - The differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BG 56 C-E and the Stihl BG 86 C-E.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86 C-E
Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86 C-E
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Far less expensive
  • Higher CFM
  • Higher MPH
According to Stihl's Internet Sales Policy, it is not possible to ship a NEW Stihl product in the USA. If you're looking to get a high quality handheld blower that can be purchased new, online, and delivered to your door, we suggest you have a look at our selection of handheld gas blowers. You may otherwise use the buttons above to see your buying options.

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

  • Belonging to the line of Stihl blowers, both the BG 56 C-E and the BG 86 C-E should have a shared standard of manufacturing and attention to detail.
  • Since both products are handheld blowers, they offer excellent mobility for your convenience.
  • gas-powered blowers, both products offer a dependable power source that can be refilled quickly, allowing you the mobility to cover extensive outdoor spaces without interruption.

CFM & MPH

  • The Stihl BG 86 C-E boasts a slightly higher CFM rating of 444 compared to the Stihl BG 56 C-E (412 CFM), suggesting it may have a slight advantage in leaf-moving power.
  • The MPH of the Stihl BG 86 C-E, at 190, modestly exceeds the 159 MPH of the Stihl BG 56 C-E, allowing it to blow leaves on grass or lift heavy debris (acorns, etc.) and wet leaves more effectively.

Weight & Noise rating

  • The weight of the Stihl BG 86 C-E, at 9.9 lbs, slightly exceeds that of the 9.3 lbs Stihl BG 56 C-E, which means you may experience slightly less fatigue and find it easier to maneuver during prolonged use.
  • At 70 dB, both devices are equally neighbor-friendly, ensuring that neither would cause undue disturbance, and equally gentle on your ears during operation.

Engine specs comparison

  • The Stihl BG 56 C-E boasts a larger fuel tank capacity, with 18.3 fl.oz., surpassing the 14.9 fl.oz. of the Stihl BG 86 C-E. Consequently, you can store more fuel, potentially extending operational time, assuming similar engine fuel consumption rates.
  • These two products share an engine displacement of 27.2cc, suggesting they might consume comparable amounts of fuel per stroke, potentially resulting in similar performance outputs.
  • Both of these leaf blowers are equipped with 2-cycle engines, meaning they require an oil/fuel mix for operation.

Other features comparison

Vacuum ability

Both products offer the functionality of a leaf vacuum, granting users a hassle-free and cleaner approach to leaf cleanup. This versatile feature enables users to effortlessly transition between blowing and vacuuming modes, streamlining outdoor maintenance tasks.

TL;DR

Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86 C-E
Stihl BG 56 C-EStihl BG 86 C-E
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Far less expensive
  • Higher CFM
  • Higher MPH
1 Comment
  1. I have a 20 year old BG56 and just bought a BG86 thinking i would have more power. I know the specs reflect that but in the real world I think my 20+ yo BG56 out performs the new one. The difference in real life performance is not worth the hundreds more for the 86. This is a money grab for Stihl. I will reconsider before i buy another Stihl product.

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0