Stihl BG 86 C-E vs BG 56 C-E - The differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BG 56 C-E and the Stihl BG 86 C-E.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BG 56 C-E	Stihl BG 86 C-E
Lighter Bigger fuel tank Far less expensive	Higher CFM Higher MPH
Show Buying Options	Show Buying Options

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

• Manufactured by Stihl, both the BG 56 C-E and the BG 86 C-E should uphold similar standards of quality and attention to detail.
• Since both products are handheld blowers, they offer excellent mobility for your convenience.
• Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.

CFM & MPH

• The Stihl BG 86 C-E boasts a slightly higher CFM rating of 444 compared to the Stihl BG 56 C-E (412 CFM), suggesting it may have a slight advantage in leaf-moving power.
• The Stihl BG 86 C-E's MPH of 190 beats the 159 MPH of the Stihl BG 56 C-E. It therefore expels air faster and should aid you blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris (acorns, etc.) and wet leaves more effectively.

Weight & Noise rating

• At 9.9 lbs, the Stihl BG 86 C-E just slightly outweighs the 9.3 lbs of the Stihl BG 56 C-E, potentially offering a touch more comfort in handling.
• With a noise rating of 70 dB for both devices, you can expect them to be equally considerate of your neighbors and equally comfortable for you to use.

Engine specs comparison

• The Stihl BG 56 C-E boasts a larger fuel tank capacity, with 18.3 fl.oz., surpassing the 14.9 fl.oz. of the Stihl BG 86 C-E. Consequently, you can store more fuel, potentially extending operational time, assuming similar engine fuel consumption rates.
• Both products boast an engine displacement of 27.2cc, hinting at similar fuel consumption rates per stroke and potentially yielding comparable performance outcomes.
• With 2-cycle engines, both leaf blowers mandate an oil/fuel mix as part of their operation.

Other features comparison

Vacuum ability

With the capability to function as leaf vacuums, both products provide users with an efficient and tidy solution for managing leaf piles. This dual-purpose design empowers users to switch between blowing and vacuuming modes with ease, simplifying their gardening endeavors.

TL;DR

Stihl BG 56 C-E	Stihl BG 86 C-E
Lighter Bigger fuel tank Far less expensive	Higher CFM Higher MPH
Show Buying Options	Show Buying Options