WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Echo PB-265LN vs Stihl BR 200 - The differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 200 and the Echo PB-265LN.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 200Echo PB-265LN
Stihl BR 200Echo PB-265LN
  • Higher CFM
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Higher MPH
  • Less noisy
  • Slighlty less expensive
Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

  • Given that the Echo PB-265LN and the Stihl BR 200 come from distinct manufacturers, their construction and technological features may differ. While the PB-265LN boasts a hip throttle, the BR 200 provides a throttle mounted on the blower tube, offering you greater maneuverability. The choice between the two boils down to personal preference and whether you value accessibility or operational adaptability.
  • Designed as backpack blowers, both products boast substantial engines and sizable fuel tanks, making them easy to carry for extended periods.
  • Both products, gas blowers, offer a swift refill system, saving you time on refueling and allowing you to efficiently manage large outdoor spaces.

CFM & MPH

  • While the difference is slight, the Stihl BR 200's CFM rating of 400 marginally outpaces the 375 CFM of the Echo PB-265LN, potentially resulting in a subtle improvement in leaf-clearing performance.
  • The MPH of 158 for the Echo PB-265LN slightly outperforms the 150 MPH of the Stihl BR 200, enhancing its effectiveness in clearing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris.

Weight & Noise rating

  • The Echo PB-265LN, weighing 13.3 lbs, edges slightly above the 12.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 200, implying that while it's marginally heavier, you may notice a tad more comfort and ease in handling the latter.
  • The noise rating of the Stihl BR 200 at 70 dB exceeds that of the Echo PB-265LN at 64 dB. Consequently, opting for the Echo PB-265LN may provide a more comfortable experience for both you and your neighbors.

Engine specs comparison

  • With its generous 35.5 fl.oz. fuel tank, the Stihl BR 200 outstrips the Echo PB-265LN, which holds 22.3 fl.oz. of fuel. This disparity means more fuel available for longer runtime, assuming comparable fuel consumption rates between the two engines.
  • In comparison, the Echo PB-265LN's engine displacement of 25.4cc is slightly surpassed by the 27.2cc of the Stihl BR 200. This indicates that the latter may consume marginally more fuel per stroke, potentially resulting in slightly greater power output.
  • Both leaf blowers come with 2-cycle engines, which necessitate an oil/fuel mix for operation.

Other features comparison

Vacuum ability

Both the Stihl BR 200 and the Echo PB-265LN lack leaf vacuuming features, meaning you'll need to employ another method for leaf collection.

TL;DR

Stihl BR 200Echo PB-265LN
Stihl BR 200Echo PB-265LN
  • Higher CFM
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Higher MPH
  • Less noisy
  • Slighlty less expensive
Show all offers
We would love to know your opinion

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0