Stihl BR 200 VS Echo PB-265LN - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 200 and the Echo PB-265LN.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 200	Echo PB-265LN

Higher CFM Lighter Bigger fuel tank	Higher MPH Less noisy Slighlty less expensive
Show Buying Options	Buy on Amazon
	Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Because the Echo PB-265LN and the Stihl BR 200 are produced by separate manufacturers, there might be differences in their overall design and technological implementation. The PB-265LN features a hip throttle, while the BR 200's throttle is positioned on the blower tube, enabling you to operate it with a free hand. The choice between hip-mount and tube-mount depends on personal preference and whether you prioritize accessibility or operational flexibility.
Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work.
Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.

With a marginal CFM advantage (400 vs 375 CFM), the Stihl BR 200 may offer a modest edge over the Echo PB-265LN (375 CFM) in terms of leaf-moving capability.
The Echo PB-265LN with an MPH of 158 slightly exceeds the 150 MPH of the Stihl BR 200, making it more effective at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris (acorns, etc.).

The weight of the Echo PB-265LN, at 13.3 lbs, slightly exceeds that of the 12.6 lbs Stihl BR 200, which means you may experience slightly less fatigue and find it easier to maneuver during prolonged use.
At 70 dB, the noise rating of the Stihl BR 200 surpasses that of the Echo PB-265LN, which stands at 64 dB. Therefore, choosing the Echo PB-265LN could offer a quieter environment for both you and your neighbors.

The Stihl BR 200 features a notably larger tank, accommodating 35.5 fl.oz. of fuel, compared to the Echo PB-265LN's 22.3 fl.oz. capacity. This allows for greater fuel storage, which could translate to extended operation, assuming both engines use fuel at similar rates.
Comparatively, the engine displacement of the Echo PB-265LN at 25.4cc falls slightly behind the 27.2cc of the Stihl BR 200. Consequently, the latter might utilize a tad more fuel per stroke, yielding a slight increase in power output.
Both leaf blowers come with 2-cycle engines, which necessitate an oil/fuel mix for operation.