Stihl BR 200 VS Echo PB-265LN - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 200 and the Echo PB-265LN.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 200	Echo PB-265LN

Higher CFM Lighter Bigger fuel tank	Higher MPH Less noisy
Show Buying Options	Buy on Amazon
	Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Since the Echo PB-265LN and the Stihl BR 200 are made by different manufacturers, you may find variations in their overall construction and the technology employed. Opting for the PB-265LN gives you a hip throttle, while the BR 200 comes with a throttle conveniently placed on the blower tube, allowing for hand-free operation. Deciding between the two depends on your preference for accessibility or operational flexibility.
Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work.
Both products, gas blowers, offer a swift refill system, saving you time on refueling and allowing you to efficiently manage large outdoor spaces.

The Stihl BR 200 with a CFM of 400 slightly exceeds the 375 CFM of the Echo PB-265LN. Thus, in comparison, you may find that the former is able to move more leaves per minute.
With an MPH of 158, the Echo PB-265LN edges out the 150 MPH of the Stihl BR 200, potentially improving its performance in leaf blowing and debris lifting tasks.

The weight of the Echo PB-265LN, at 13.3 lbs, slightly exceeds that of the 12.6 lbs Stihl BR 200, which means you may experience slightly less fatigue and find it easier to maneuver during prolonged use.
With a noise rating of 70 dB, the Stihl BR 200 exceeds the 64 dB rating of the Echo PB-265LN. Consequently, selecting the Echo PB-265LN might ensure a more peaceful atmosphere for both you and your neighbors.

With its ample fuel capacity of 35.5 fl.oz., the Stihl BR 200 surpasses the Echo PB-265LN's 22.3 fl.oz. tank. This larger reservoir means more fuel on hand, potentially extending runtime, provided both engines consume fuel at similar rates.
When comparing engine displacements, the 27.2cc engine of the Stihl BR 200 edges out the 25.4cc engine of the Echo PB-265LN. This indicates a potential slight increase in fuel consumption per stroke and a corresponding bump in power output.
These leaf blowers are both powered by 2-cycle engines, requiring an oil/fuel mix to function.