Stihl BR 200 VS Echo PB-265LN - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 200 and the Echo PB-265LN.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 200	Echo PB-265LN

Higher CFM Lighter Bigger fuel tank	Higher MPH Less noisy
Show Buying Options	Buy on Amazon
	Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Because the Echo PB-265LN and the Stihl BR 200 are produced by separate manufacturers, there might be differences in their overall design and technological implementation. In the PB-265LN, you'll find a hip throttle, whereas the BR 200 offers a throttle on the blower tube, granting you the freedom to use your hand more easily. Whether you prefer the hip-mount or tube-mount is entirely up to your preference, and whether you prioritize ease of access or operational flexibility.
These two products are constructed as backpack blowers, allowing you to comfortably carry their big engines and massive fuel tanks.
Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.

With a marginal CFM advantage (400 vs 375 CFM), the Stihl BR 200 may offer a modest edge over the Echo PB-265LN (375 CFM) in terms of leaf-moving capability.
The Echo PB-265LN with an MPH of 158 slightly exceeds the 150 MPH of the Stihl BR 200, making it more effective at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris (acorns, etc.).

The Echo PB-265LN, weighing 13.3 lbs, edges slightly above the 12.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 200, implying that while it's marginally heavier, you may notice a tad more comfort and ease in handling the latter.
The Stihl BR 200 registers a noise rating of 70 dB, slightly above the 64 dB rating of the Echo PB-265LN. Opting for the Echo PB-265LN could result in a quieter experience for both you and your neighbors.

The Stihl BR 200 features a notably larger tank, accommodating 35.5 fl.oz. of fuel, compared to the Echo PB-265LN's 22.3 fl.oz. capacity. This allows for greater fuel storage, which could translate to extended operation, assuming both engines use fuel at similar rates.
Comparatively, the engine displacement of the Echo PB-265LN at 25.4cc falls slightly behind the 27.2cc of the Stihl BR 200. Consequently, the latter might utilize a tad more fuel per stroke, yielding a slight increase in power output.
Both of these leaf blowers are equipped with 2-cycle engines, meaning they require an oil/fuel mix for operation.