WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Echo PB-2520 vs Stihl BG 86 - The differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BG 86 and the Echo PB-2520.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BG 86Echo PB-2520
Stihl BG 86Echo PB-2520
  • Higher MPH
  • Leaf vacuum
  • Higher CFM
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Far less expensive
Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

  • As the Echo PB-2520 and the Stihl BG 86 do not share the same manufacturer, their overall build and technology in use can vary.
  • As handheld blowers, both products grant you superior maneuverability wherever you need to work.
  • Both products, gas blowers, offer a swift refill system, saving you time on refueling and allowing you to efficiently manage large outdoor spaces.

CFM & MPH

  • The Echo PB-2520 boasts a slightly higher CFM rating of 453 compared to the Stihl BG 86 (444 CFM), suggesting it may have a slight advantage in leaf-moving power.
  • The Stihl BG 86, with an MPH of 190, modestly outpaces the 170 MPH of the Echo PB-2520, ensuring slightly quicker air expulsion for more efficient leaf blowing and debris lifting.

Weight & Noise rating

  • At 9.7 lbs, the Stihl BG 86 just slightly outweighs the 8.8 lbs of the Echo PB-2520, potentially offering a touch more comfort in handling.
  • With a noise rating of 70 dB for both devices, you can expect them to be equally considerate of your neighbors and equally comfortable for you to use.

Engine specs comparison

  • The Echo PB-2520 boasts a larger fuel tank capacity, with 18.6 fl.oz., surpassing the 14.9 fl.oz. of the Stihl BG 86. Consequently, you can store more fuel, potentially extending operational time, assuming similar engine fuel consumption rates.
  • When comparing engine displacements, the 27.2cc engine of the Stihl BG 86 edges out the 25.4cc engine of the Echo PB-2520. This indicates a potential slight increase in fuel consumption per stroke and a corresponding bump in power output.
  • Both leaf blowers come with 2-cycle engines, which necessitate an oil/fuel mix for operation.

Other features comparison

Vacuum ability

In contrast to the Echo PB-2520, the Stihl BG 86 doubles as a leaf vacuum – offering a convenient and tidier approach to leaf disposal, particularly when faced with large piles of leaves.

TL;DR

Stihl BG 86Echo PB-2520
Stihl BG 86Echo PB-2520
  • Higher MPH
  • Leaf vacuum
  • Higher CFM
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Far less expensive
Show all offers
1 Comment
  1. Comfort is the key? Then I would say (being in my 60s and using the stihl 86 for 15 years) it is the way to go. The anti-vibration handle picks up a lot of the uncomfortableness that you get in other blowers. I go through anywhere from 1/2 to a whole tank of gas at a time. Yes it is about 1lb. More, but it really doesn’t feel that different. My old blower was an echo.

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0