WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Echo PB-2520 vs Stihl BG 86 - The differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BG 86 and the Echo PB-2520.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BG 86Echo PB-2520
Stihl BG 86Echo PB-2520
  • Higher MPH
  • Leaf vacuum
  • Higher CFM
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Far less expensive
Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

  • Since the Echo PB-2520 and the Stihl BG 86 are made by different manufacturers, you may find variations in their overall construction and the technology employed.
  • Since both products are handheld blowers, they offer excellent mobility for your convenience.
  • Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.

CFM & MPH

  • With a marginal CFM advantage (453 vs 444 CFM), the Echo PB-2520 may offer a modest edge over the Stihl BG 86 (444 CFM) in terms of leaf-moving capability.
  • The Stihl BG 86, with an MPH of 190, modestly outpaces the 170 MPH of the Echo PB-2520, ensuring slightly quicker air expulsion for more efficient leaf blowing and debris lifting.

Weight & Noise rating

  • The Stihl BG 86, weighing 9.7 lbs, edges slightly above the 8.8 lbs of the Echo PB-2520, implying that while it's marginally heavier, you may notice a tad more comfort and ease in handling the latter.
  • Both devices have a noise rating of 70 dB, ensuring they would neither cause significantly more disturbance to neighbors than the other, nor be noticeably louder to the operator's ears.

Engine specs comparison

  • The Echo PB-2520's fuel tank has a volume of 18.6 fl.oz., exceeding the 14.9 fl.oz. of the Stihl BG 86. Therefore, you may store more fuel in the device and theoretically operate it longer, if their engines are equally demanding.
  • Comparatively, the engine displacement of the Echo PB-2520 at 25.4cc falls slightly behind the 27.2cc of the Stihl BG 86. Consequently, the latter might utilize a tad more fuel per stroke, yielding a slight increase in power output.
  • Both of these leaf blowers are equipped with 2-cycle engines, meaning they require an oil/fuel mix for operation.

Other features comparison

Vacuum ability

While the Echo PB-2520 lacks this feature, the Stihl BG 86 serves as a versatile leaf vacuum, simplifying leaf cleanup with its convenient and less-messy approach, especially useful when tackling extensive leaf piles.

TL;DR

Stihl BG 86Echo PB-2520
Stihl BG 86Echo PB-2520
  • Higher MPH
  • Leaf vacuum
  • Higher CFM
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Far less expensive
Show all offers
1 Comment
  1. Comfort is the key? Then I would say (being in my 60s and using the stihl 86 for 15 years) it is the way to go. The anti-vibration handle picks up a lot of the uncomfortableness that you get in other blowers. I go through anywhere from 1/2 to a whole tank of gas at a time. Yes it is about 1lb. More, but it really doesn’t feel that different. My old blower was an echo.

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0