Stihl BR 350 VS BR 700 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 350 and the Stihl BR 700.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 350	Stihl BR 700

Higher MPH Lighter Less noisy Bigger fuel tank Far less expensive	Higher CFM 4-Mix engine
Show Buying Options	Show Buying Options

Common specs comparison

Manufactured by Stihl, both the BR 350 and the BR 700 should uphold similar standards of quality and attention to detail. On both products, the throttle is situated on the blower tube, giving you the advantage of having your left hand available for other uses.
These two products are constructed as backpack blowers, allowing you to comfortably carry their big engines and massive fuel tanks.
Both products, gas blowers, offer a swift refill system, saving you time on refueling and allowing you to efficiently manage large outdoor spaces.

The Stihl BR 700, boasting a CFM of 912, clearly outperforms the 436 CFM of the Stihl BR 350. With this higher CFM, the Stihl BR 700 promises a vastly improved leaf blowing capability, allowing you to tackle larger areas with ease.
The Stihl BR 350 with an MPH of 201 slightly exceeds the 197 MPH of the Stihl BR 700, making it more effective at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris (acorns, etc.).

Weighing 23.4 lbs, the Stihl BR 700 tips the scales slightly above the 22 lbs of the Stihl BR 350, implying that while it's marginally heavier, users may still experience a touch more convenience in operation.
While the noise variation between the Stihl BR 700, recorded at 75 dB, and the Stihl BR 350, noted at 74 dB, seems marginal, it could still influence the operator and neighboring individuals.

The Stihl BR 350 boasts a larger fuel tank capacity, with 57.5 fl.oz., surpassing the 47.3 fl.oz. of the Stihl BR 700. Consequently, you can store more fuel, potentially extending operational time, assuming similar engine fuel consumption rates.
When comparing engine displacements, the 64.8cc engine of the Stihl BR 700 edges out the 63.3cc engine of the Stihl BR 350. This indicates a potential slight increase in fuel consumption per stroke and a corresponding bump in power output.
Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the Stihl BR 350 features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 700 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.