Stihl BR 430 VS Echo PB-580T - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 430 and the Echo PB-580T.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 430	Echo PB-580T

Higher MPH Lighter	Higher CFM Less noisy Bigger fuel tank Slighlty less expensive
Show Buying Options	Buy on Amazon
	Show all offers

Common specs comparison

Since the Echo PB-580T and the Stihl BR 430 are made by different manufacturers, you may find variations in their overall construction and the technology employed. You'll find the throttle positioned on the tube of both products, ensuring that your left hand remains unoccupied for other activities.
Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work.
gas-powered blowers, both products offer a dependable power source that can be refilled quickly, allowing you the mobility to cover extensive outdoor spaces without interruption.

While the difference is slight, the Echo PB-580T's CFM rating of 517 marginally outpaces the 500 CFM of the Stihl BR 430, potentially resulting in a subtle improvement in leaf-clearing performance.
The MPH of 219 for the Stihl BR 430 slightly outperforms the 216 MPH of the Echo PB-580T, enhancing its effectiveness in clearing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris.

The Echo PB-580T, weighing 22.7 lbs, edges slightly above the 22.3 lbs of the Stihl BR 430, implying that while it's marginally heavier, you may notice a tad more comfort and ease in handling the latter.
The noise rating of the Stihl BR 430 at 76 dB exceeds that of the Echo PB-580T at 70 dB. Consequently, opting for the Echo PB-580T may provide a more comfortable experience for both you and your neighbors.

The Echo PB-580T features a slightly larger fuel tank, with a capacity of 62 fl.oz., potentially allowing for longer operational periods, provided its engine is as fuel-efficient as that of the Stihl BR 430.
With engine displacements that are nearly indistinguishable, both products are expected to consume fuel at similar rates per stroke, thereby delivering comparable output.
Both of these leaf blowers are equipped with 2-cycle engines, meaning they require an oil/fuel mix for operation.