Stihl BR 430 VS Echo PB-580T - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 430 and the Echo PB-580T.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 430	Echo PB-580T

Higher MPH Lighter	Higher CFM Less noisy Bigger fuel tank Less expensive
Show Buying Options	Buy on Amazon
	Show all offers

Common specs comparison

As the Echo PB-580T and the Stihl BR 430 do not share the same manufacturer, their overall build and technology in use can vary. On both products, the throttle is situated on the blower tube, giving you the advantage of having your left hand available for other uses.
Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work.
Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.

With a marginal CFM advantage (517 vs 500 CFM), the Echo PB-580T may offer a modest edge over the Stihl BR 430 (500 CFM) in terms of leaf-moving capability.
With an MPH of 219, the Stihl BR 430 edges out the 216 MPH of the Echo PB-580T, potentially improving its performance in leaf blowing and debris lifting tasks.

Weighing 22.7 lbs, the Echo PB-580T tips the scales slightly above the 22.3 lbs of the Stihl BR 430, implying that while it's marginally heavier, users may still experience a touch more convenience in operation.
The noise rating of the Stihl BR 430 at 76 dB exceeds that of the Echo PB-580T at 70 dB. Consequently, opting for the Echo PB-580T may provide a more comfortable experience for both you and your neighbors.

The Echo PB-580T boasts a slightly larger fuel tank, holding 62 fl.oz., in contrast to the 57.5 fl.oz. of the Stihl BR 430. This allows for longer operation and fewer interruptions for refueling, particularly beneficial if the engines have comparable fuel consumption rates.
The engine displacements of these two products are practically identical, suggesting that their fuel consumption per stroke and resulting output should be on par with each other.
With 2-cycle engines, both leaf blowers mandate an oil/fuel mix as part of their operation.