Echo PB-770T vs Stihl BR 600 - The Differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 600 and the Echo PB-770T.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 600	Echo PB-770T
Higher MPH Lighter 4-Mix engine Less expensive	Higher CFM Less noisy Bigger fuel tank
Show Buying Options	Buy on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
	Show all offers

Feel, Fuel & Noise

Because the Echo PB-770T and the Stihl BR 600 are produced by separate manufacturers, there might be differences in their overall design and technological implementation.

• Handling: Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work. The throttle for both products is conveniently placed on the blower's tube, freeing up your left hand for other tasks.
• Power Source: Both products, gas blowers, offer a swift refill system, saving you time on refueling and allowing you to efficiently manage large outdoor spaces.
• Weight:
  Weighing 24.3 lbs, the Echo PB-770T is a bit heavier than the Stihl BR 600 at 22.3 lbs, so users sensitive to weight might find the lighter option slightly more comfortable.
• Noise: While the noise variation between the Stihl BR 600, recorded at 75 dB, and the Echo PB-770T, noted at 74 dB, seems marginal, it could still influence the operator and neighboring individuals.

CFM & MPH

• CFM:
  Comparatively, the Echo PB-770T boasts a CFM of 756, surpassing the 677 CFM of the Stihl BR 600, positioning it as the more effective choice for clearing leaves in a shorter amount of time.
• MPH: The Stihl BR 600 with an MPH of 238 slightly exceeds the 234 MPH of the Echo PB-770T, making it more effective at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris (acorns, etc.).

Engine specs

• Fuel Tank: With its generous 68.3 fl.oz. fuel tank, the Echo PB-770T outstrips the Stihl BR 600, which holds 47.3 fl.oz. of fuel. This disparity means more fuel available for longer runtime, assuming comparable fuel consumption rates between the two engines. The lower fuel tank capacity of the Stihl BR 600 can be accounted for by its Handheld handling. In contrast, the Echo PB-770T's backpack design allows you to comfortably carry a larger fuel tank’s weight and dimensions.
• Engine: In contrast, the Echo PB-770T's engine, with a displacement of 63.3 cc, is slightly surpassed by the 64.8-cc engine of the Stihl BR 600. As a result, the latter may consume marginally more fuel per stroke, potentially resulting in a slight power advantage. Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the Echo PB-770T features a 2-stroke engine, and the Stihl BR 600 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.

Other features

• Vacuum Ability: Neither the Stihl BR 600 nor the Echo PB-770T can vacuum leaves, so you'll need an alternative approach to collect them.

TL;DR

Stihl BR 600	Echo PB-770T
Higher MPH Lighter 4-Mix engine Less expensive	Higher CFM Less noisy Bigger fuel tank
Show Buying Options	Buy on Amazon (opens in a new tab)
	Show all offers