WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Echo PB-770T vs Stihl BR 600 - The Differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 600 and the Echo PB-770T.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 600Echo PB-770T
Stihl BR 600Echo PB-770T
  • Higher MPH
  • Lighter
  • 4-Mix engine
  • Higher CFM
  • Less noisy
  • Bigger fuel tank

Feel, Fuel & Noise

Given that the Echo PB-770T and the Stihl BR 600 come from distinct manufacturers, their construction and technological features may differ.

  • Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work. The throttle for both products is conveniently placed on the blower's tube, freeing up your left hand for other tasks.
  • Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.
  • At 24.3 lbs, the Echo PB-770T exceeds the 21.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 600, resulting in a heavier load for users and potentially leading to more fatigue over prolonged usage.
  • While the noise variation between the Stihl BR 600, recorded at 75 dB, and the Echo PB-770T, noted at 74 dB, seems marginal, it could still influence the operator and neighboring individuals.

CFM & MPH

  • In contrast, the Echo PB-770T, with its CFM of 756, outperforms the 677 CFM of the Stihl BR 600, making it the preferred option for efficiently blowing leaves away.
  • The Stihl BR 600 with an MPH of 238 slightly exceeds the 234 MPH of the Echo PB-770T, making it more effective at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris (acorns, etc.).

Engine specs

  • The Echo PB-770T features a notably larger tank, accommodating 68.3 fl.oz. of fuel, compared to the Stihl BR 600's 47.3 fl.oz. capacity. This allows for greater fuel storage, which could translate to extended operation, assuming both engines use fuel at similar rates.
  • When comparing engine displacements, the 64.8-cc engine of the Stihl BR 600 edges out the 63.3-cc engine of the Echo PB-770T. This indicates a potential slight increase in fuel consumption per stroke and a corresponding bump in power output. Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the Echo PB-770T features a 2-stroke engine, and the Stihl BR 600 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.

Other features

  • Neither the Stihl BR 600 nor the Echo PB-770T has the ability to vacuum leaves. Thus, you will require another method of leaf collection.

TL;DR

Stihl BR 600Echo PB-770T
Stihl BR 600Echo PB-770T
  • Higher MPH
  • Lighter
  • 4-Mix engine
  • Higher CFM
  • Less noisy
  • Bigger fuel tank
1 Comment
  1. Recently saw a you tube video where the piston connecting rod of the larger Stihl backpack blowers
    used brass bushings in place of bearings. Any comments?

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0