Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 600 and the RedMax EBZ7500.
But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:
| Stihl BR 600 | RedMax EBZ7500 |
|---|---|
 |  |
|
|
| Show Buying Options |
Common specs comparison
Make & handling
- Because the RedMax EBZ7500 and the Stihl BR 600 are produced by separate manufacturers, there might be differences in their overall design and technological implementation. Opting for the EBZ7500 gives you a hip throttle, while the BR 600 comes with a throttle conveniently placed on the blower tube, allowing for hand-free operation. Deciding between the two depends on your preference for accessibility or operational flexibility.
- Manufactured as backpack blowers, these two products are equipped with large engines and spacious fuel tanks, offering comfortable carrying while you work.
- Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.
CFM & MPH
- Comparatively, the RedMax EBZ7500 boasts a CFM of 768, surpassing the 677 CFM of the Stihl BR 600, positioning it as the more effective choice for clearing leaves in a shorter amount of time.
- The MPH of 238 for the Stihl BR 600 slightly outperforms the 236 MPH of the RedMax EBZ7500, enhancing its effectiveness in clearing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris.
Weight & Noise rating
- At 23.4 lbs, the RedMax EBZ7500 just slightly outweighs the 21.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 600, potentially offering a touch more comfort in handling.
- With a noise level of 103 dB, the RedMax EBZ7500 generates considerably more sound than the 75 dB of the Stihl BR 600. Opting for the latter will offer a significantly quieter experience for you and reduce potential disturbance to nearby residents.
Engine specs comparison
- The RedMax EBZ7500 boasts a significantly larger fuel tank, holding 71 fl.oz. compared to the Stihl BR 600's 47.3 fl.oz. This allows for substantially more fuel storage and potentially longer operation, assuming similar fuel consumption rates for both engines.
- These two products feature engine displacements that are virtually the same, implying that their fuel consumption per stroke and overall performance should be closely matched.
- Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the RedMax EBZ7500 features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 600 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.
Other features comparison
Vacuum ability
With no leaf vacuuming functionality in either the Stihl BR 600 or the RedMax EBZ7500, you'll have to find another way to gather leaves.
TL;DR
| Stihl BR 600 | RedMax EBZ7500 |
|---|---|
| |
|
|
| Show Buying Options |
