Stihl BR 600 VS RedMax EBZ7500 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 600 and the RedMax EBZ7500.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 600	RedMax EBZ7500

Tube throttle Higher MPH Lighter Less noisy 4-Mix engine	Hip throttle Higher CFM Bigger fuel tank
Show Buying Options	Buy on Amazon
	Show all offers

Common specs comparison

As the RedMax EBZ7500 and the Stihl BR 600 do not share the same manufacturer, their overall build and technology in use can vary. The EBZ7500 has a hip throttle, whereas the BR 600's throttle is located on the tube of the blower and allows you to free your left hand. Whether the hip-mount or the tube-mount is better is a matter of personal preference.
These two products are constructed as backpack blowers, allowing you to comfortably carry their powerful engines and massive fuel tanks.
Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds.

In comparison, the RedMax EBZ7500, with a CFM of 768, beats the 677 CFM of the Stihl BR 600, making it the superior landscaping tool of the two, when it comes to the amount of leaves that can be blown per minute.
The Stihl BR 600 with an MPH of 238 slightly exceeds the 236 MPH of the RedMax EBZ7500. Thus, in comparison, the former expels air at a slightly higher speed, and should do a better job at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet leaves and debris (acorns, etc.).

The weight of the RedMax EBZ7500, which is 23.4 lbs, slightly exceeds the 21.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 600, and will therefore require you to carry around slightly more weight.
The RedMax EBZ7500 produces 103 dB, which is significantly higher than the 75 dB of the Stihl BR 600. Thus, the latter will be much easier on your ears.

The RedMax EBZ7500's 71 fl.oz. fuel tank outmatches the Stihl BR 600's 47.3 fl.oz. You may fill it up with way more fuel and presumably run it longer, if both engines had the same fuel consumption.
In comparison, the Stihl BR 600's engine displacement of 64.8 cc is slightly outperformed by the 65.6 cc of the RedMax EBZ7500. This suggests that the latter consumes slightly larger amounts of fuel per stroke and will provide you with slightly more power.
Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the RedMax EBZ7500 features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 600 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.