Stihl BR 600 VS RedMax EBZ7500 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 600 and the RedMax EBZ7500.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 600	RedMax EBZ7500

Higher MPH Lighter Less noisy 4-Mix engine	Higher CFM Bigger fuel tank
Show Buying Options	$569.99 on eBay

Common specs comparison

Given that the RedMax EBZ7500 and the Stihl BR 600 come from distinct manufacturers, their construction and technological features may differ. In the EBZ7500, you'll find a hip throttle, whereas the BR 600 offers a throttle on the blower tube, granting you the freedom to use your hand more easily. Whether you prefer the hip-mount or tube-mount is entirely up to your preference, and whether you prioritize ease of access or operational flexibility.
These two products are constructed as backpack blowers, allowing you to comfortably carry their big engines and massive fuel tanks.
Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.

In comparison, the RedMax EBZ7500, with a CFM of 768, beats the 677 CFM of the Stihl BR 600, making it the superior landscaping tool of the two, when it comes to the amount of leaves that can be blown per minute.
The MPH of 238 for the Stihl BR 600 slightly outperforms the 236 MPH of the RedMax EBZ7500, enhancing its effectiveness in clearing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris.

At 23.4 lbs, the RedMax EBZ7500 just slightly outweighs the 21.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 600, potentially offering a touch more comfort in handling.
With a noise level of 103 dB, the RedMax EBZ7500 generates considerably more sound than the 75 dB of the Stihl BR 600. Opting for the latter will offer a significantly quieter experience for you and reduce potential disturbance to nearby residents.

The RedMax EBZ7500 boasts a significantly larger fuel tank, holding 71 fl.oz. compared to the Stihl BR 600's 47.3 fl.oz. This allows for substantially more fuel storage and potentially longer operation, assuming similar fuel consumption rates for both engines.
These two products boast engine displacements that are nearly identical. Consequently, their fuel consumption per stroke should be comparable, resulting in similar output levels.
Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the RedMax EBZ7500 features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 600 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.