Stihl BR 600 VS RedMax EBZ7500 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 600 and the RedMax EBZ7500.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 600	RedMax EBZ7500

Higher MPH Lighter Less noisy 4-Mix engine	Higher CFM Bigger fuel tank
Show Buying Options	$619.95 on eBay

Common specs comparison

As the RedMax EBZ7500 and the Stihl BR 600 do not share the same manufacturer, their overall build and technology in use can vary. While the EBZ7500 boasts a hip throttle, the BR 600 provides a throttle mounted on the blower tube, offering you greater maneuverability. The choice between the two boils down to personal preference and whether you value accessibility or operational adaptability.
Engineered as backpack blowers, these two products feature sizeable engines and large fuel tanks, ensuring comfortable carrying during operation.
Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.

Comparatively, the RedMax EBZ7500 boasts a CFM of 768, surpassing the 677 CFM of the Stihl BR 600, positioning it as the more effective choice for clearing leaves in a shorter amount of time.
The Stihl BR 600 with an MPH of 238 slightly exceeds the 236 MPH of the RedMax EBZ7500, making it more effective at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris (acorns, etc.).

The weight of the RedMax EBZ7500, at 23.4 lbs, slightly exceeds that of the 21.6 lbs Stihl BR 600, which means you may experience slightly less fatigue and find it easier to maneuver during prolonged use.
The RedMax EBZ7500 emits a noise level of 103 dB, significantly louder than the 75 dB of the Stihl BR 600. This difference means that the latter will provide a much quieter experience for you and be less likely to disturb your neighbors.

With its ample fuel capacity of 71 fl.oz., the RedMax EBZ7500 surpasses the Stihl BR 600's 47.3 fl.oz. tank. This larger reservoir means more fuel on hand, potentially extending runtime, provided both engines consume fuel at similar rates.
The engine displacements of these two products are practically identical, suggesting that their fuel consumption per stroke and resulting output should be on par with each other.
Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the RedMax EBZ7500 features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 600 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.