Stihl BR 600 VS RedMax EBZ8500 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 600 and the RedMax EBZ8500.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 600	RedMax EBZ8500 (DISCONTINUED)

Higher MPH Lighter Less noisy 4-Mix engine	Higher CFM Bigger fuel tank Bigger engine
Show Buying Options

Common specs comparison

As the RedMax EBZ8500 and the Stihl BR 600 do not share the same manufacturer, their overall build and technology in use can vary. In the EBZ8500, you'll find a hip throttle, whereas the BR 600 offers a throttle on the blower tube, granting you the freedom to use your hand more easily. Whether you prefer the hip-mount or tube-mount is entirely up to your preference, and whether you prioritize ease of access or operational flexibility.
Engineered as backpack blowers, these two products feature sizeable engines and large fuel tanks, ensuring comfortable carrying during operation.
Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.

The RedMax EBZ8500, providing a CFM of 908, outmatches the 677 CFM of the Stihl BR 600. Your leaf blowing experience will therefore be outstandingly improved with the RedMax EBZ8500, as it should be able to move considerably more leaves per minute.
With an MPH of 238, the Stihl BR 600 moderately surpasses the 206 MPH of the RedMax EBZ8500, offering slightly superior airspeed for enhanced performance in blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris and wet leaves.

The heavier RedMax EBZ8500, weighing 24.7 lbs, surpasses the 21.6 lbs of the Stihl BR 600, requiring more effort to maneuver and resulting in increased fatigue during prolonged use.
With a noise level of 103 dB, the RedMax EBZ8500 generates considerably more sound than the 75 dB of the Stihl BR 600. Opting for the latter will offer a significantly quieter experience for you and reduce potential disturbance to nearby residents.

With its ample fuel capacity of 77.7 fl.oz., the RedMax EBZ8500 surpasses the Stihl BR 600's 47.3 fl.oz. tank. This larger reservoir means more fuel on hand, potentially extending runtime, provided both engines consume fuel at similar rates.
When compared, the engine displacement of the Stihl BR 600, at 64.8cc, is less than the 75.6cc of the RedMax EBZ8500. Consequently, the latter may consume more fuel per stroke, resulting in a potentially higher power output.
Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the RedMax EBZ8500 features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 600 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.