Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 700 and the Echo PB-770T.
But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:
Stihl BR 700 | Echo PB-770T |
---|---|
|
|
Show Buying Options | Buy on Amazon |
Show all offers |
Common specs comparison
Make & handling
- As the Echo PB-770T and the Stihl BR 700 do not share the same manufacturer, their overall build and technology in use can vary. The throttle for both products is conveniently placed on the blower's tube, freeing up your left hand for other tasks.
- Designed as backpack blowers, both products boast substantial engines and sizable fuel tanks, making them easy to carry for extended periods.
- Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.
CFM & MPH
- In comparison, the Stihl BR 700, with a CFM of 912, beats the 756 CFM of the Echo PB-770T, making it the superior landscaping tool of the two, when it comes to the amount of leaves that can be blown per minute.
- The Echo PB-770T, with an MPH of 234, modestly outpaces the 197 MPH of the Stihl BR 700, ensuring slightly quicker air expulsion for more efficient leaf blowing and debris lifting.
Weight & Noise rating
- At 24.3 lbs, the Echo PB-770T just slightly outweighs the 23.4 lbs of the Stihl BR 700, potentially offering a touch more comfort in handling.
- The slight disparity in noise rating between the Stihl BR 700 at 75 dB and the Echo PB-770T at 74 dB could have tangible effects. While the operator might experience slightly more noise, nearby neighbors may also perceive a subtle increase in disturbance.
Engine specs comparison
- With its generous 68.3 fl.oz. fuel tank, the Echo PB-770T outstrips the Stihl BR 700, which holds 47.3 fl.oz. of fuel. This disparity means more fuel available for longer runtime, assuming comparable fuel consumption rates between the two engines.
- In comparison, the Echo PB-770T's engine displacement of 63.3cc is slightly surpassed by the 64.8cc of the Stihl BR 700. This indicates that the latter may consume marginally more fuel per stroke, potentially resulting in slightly greater power output.
- Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the Echo PB-770T features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 700 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.
Other features comparison
Vacuum ability
With no leaf vacuuming functionality in either the Stihl BR 700 or the Echo PB-770T, you'll have to find another way to gather leaves.
TL;DR
Stihl BR 700 | Echo PB-770T |
---|---|
|
|
Show Buying Options | Buy on Amazon |
Show all offers |