Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 700 and the Echo PB-770T.
But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:
Stihl BR 700 | Echo PB-770T |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Show Buying Options | Buy on Amazon |
Show all offers |
Common specs comparison
Make & handling
- Because the Echo PB-770T and the Stihl BR 700 are produced by separate manufacturers, there might be differences in their overall design and technological implementation. Both products have their throttle located on the tube of the blower, which allows you to keep your left hand free.
- Engineered as backpack blowers, these two products feature sizeable engines and large fuel tanks, ensuring comfortable carrying during operation.
- Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.
CFM & MPH
- Comparatively, the Stihl BR 700 boasts a CFM of 912, surpassing the 756 CFM of the Echo PB-770T, positioning it as the more effective choice for clearing leaves in a shorter amount of time.
- The Echo PB-770T's MPH of 234 beats the 197 MPH of the Stihl BR 700. It therefore expels air faster and should aid you blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris (acorns, etc.) and wet leaves more effectively.
Weight & Noise rating
- At 24.3 lbs, the Echo PB-770T just slightly outweighs the 23.4 lbs of the Stihl BR 700, potentially offering a touch more comfort in handling.
- Although the difference in noise rating between the Stihl BR 700, registering at 75 dB, and the Echo PB-770T, at 74 dB, appears minor, it can impact both the operator's experience and nearby neighbors.
Engine specs comparison
- With its ample fuel capacity of 68.3 fl.oz., the Echo PB-770T surpasses the Stihl BR 700's 47.3 fl.oz. tank. This larger reservoir means more fuel on hand, potentially extending runtime, provided both engines consume fuel at similar rates.
- In contrast, the Echo PB-770T's engine, with a displacement of 63.3cc, is slightly surpassed by the 64.8cc engine of the Stihl BR 700. As a result, the latter may consume marginally more fuel per stroke, potentially resulting in a slight power advantage.
- Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the Echo PB-770T features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 700 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.
Other features comparison
Vacuum ability
With no leaf vacuuming functionality in either the Stihl BR 700 or the Echo PB-770T, you'll have to find another way to gather leaves.
TL;DR
Stihl BR 700 | Echo PB-770T |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Show Buying Options | Buy on Amazon |
Show all offers |