Stihl BR 700 VS RedMax EBZ8500 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl BR 700 and the RedMax EBZ8500.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl BR 700	RedMax EBZ8500 (DISCONTINUED)

Higher CFM Lighter Less noisy 4-Mix engine	Higher MPH Bigger fuel tank Bigger engine
Show Buying Options

Common specs comparison

Because the RedMax EBZ8500 and the Stihl BR 700 are produced by separate manufacturers, there might be differences in their overall design and technological implementation. The EBZ8500 features a hip throttle, while the BR 700's throttle is positioned on the blower tube, enabling you to operate it with a free hand. The choice between hip-mount and tube-mount depends on personal preference and whether you prioritize accessibility or operational flexibility.
These two products are constructed as backpack blowers, allowing you to comfortably carry their big engines and massive fuel tanks.
gas-powered blowers, both products offer a dependable power source that can be refilled quickly, allowing you the mobility to cover extensive outdoor spaces without interruption.

While the difference is slight, the Stihl BR 700's CFM rating of 912 marginally outpaces the 908 CFM of the RedMax EBZ8500, potentially resulting in a subtle improvement in leaf-clearing performance.
The MPH of 206 for the RedMax EBZ8500 slightly outperforms the 197 MPH of the Stihl BR 700, enhancing its effectiveness in clearing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris.

The RedMax EBZ8500, weighing 24.7 lbs, edges slightly above the 23.4 lbs of the Stihl BR 700, implying that while it's marginally heavier, you may notice a tad more comfort and ease in handling the latter.
With a noise level of 103 dB, the RedMax EBZ8500 generates considerably more sound than the 75 dB of the Stihl BR 700. Opting for the latter will offer a significantly quieter experience for you and reduce potential disturbance to nearby residents.

The RedMax EBZ8500 features a notably larger tank, accommodating 77.7 fl.oz. of fuel, compared to the Stihl BR 700's 47.3 fl.oz. capacity. This allows for greater fuel storage, which could translate to extended operation, assuming both engines use fuel at similar rates.
When compared, the engine displacement of the Stihl BR 700, at 64.8cc, is less than the 75.6cc of the RedMax EBZ8500. Consequently, the latter may consume more fuel per stroke, resulting in a potentially higher power output.
Each of these blowers requires a fuel/oil mix to operate, as the RedMax EBZ8500 features a 2-cycle engine, and the Stihl BR 700 is powered by the Stihl 4-Mix 4-stroke engine.