WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Stihl SH 86 C-E vs SH 56 C-E - The differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Stihl SH 56 C-E and the Stihl SH 86 C-E.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Stihl SH 56 C-EStihl SH 86 C-E
Stihl SH 56 C-EStihl SH 86 C-E
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Significantly less expensive
  • Higher CFM
  • Higher MPH

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

  • Belonging to the line of Stihl blowers, both the SH 56 C-E and the SH 86 C-E should have a shared standard of manufacturing and attention to detail.
  • Being handheld blowers, these two products ensure exceptional mobility while in use.
  • Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds, offering you the freedom of movement to tackle larger outdoor spaces with ease.

CFM & MPH

  • The Stihl SH 86 C-E with a CFM of 444 slightly exceeds the 412 CFM of the Stihl SH 56 C-E. Thus, in comparison, you may find that the former is able to move more leaves per minute.
  • The MPH of 170 for the Stihl SH 86 C-E slightly outperforms the 159 MPH of the Stihl SH 56 C-E, enhancing its effectiveness in clearing leaves on grass or lifting wet debris.

Weight & Noise rating

  • At 12.3 lbs, the Stihl SH 86 C-E just slightly outweighs the 11.5 lbs of the Stihl SH 56 C-E, potentially offering a touch more comfort in handling.
  • With a noise rating of 70 dB for both devices, you can expect them to be equally considerate of your neighbors and equally comfortable for you to use.

Engine specs comparison

  • The Stihl SH 56 C-E's fuel tank has a volume of 18.3 fl.oz., exceeding the 14.9 fl.oz. of the Stihl SH 86 C-E. Therefore, you may store more fuel in the device and theoretically operate it longer, if their engines are equally demanding.
  • The engine displacement of 27.2cc in both products indicates similar fuel consumption per stroke, potentially leading to equivalent performance capabilities.
  • With 2-cycle engines, both leaf blowers mandate an oil/fuel mix as part of their operation.

Other features comparison

Vacuum ability

Equipped with leaf vacuuming capabilities, both products offer users a practical and mess-free method for leaf disposal. This dual-functionality allows users to seamlessly alternate between blowing and vacuuming modes, making yard work more convenient and efficient. Furthermore, both the SH 56 C-E and the SH 86 C-E are equipped with a mulching function, offering a comparable mulching ratio of 14:1. This feature enables you to effortlessly convert vacuumed leaves into nutrient-rich mulch or compost, providing added convenience in your yard maintenance routine.

TL;DR

Stihl SH 56 C-EStihl SH 86 C-E
Stihl SH 56 C-EStihl SH 86 C-E
  • Lighter
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Significantly less expensive
  • Higher CFM
  • Higher MPH
We would love to know your opinion

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0