WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

Echo PB-255LN vs PB-2520 - The Differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Echo PB-2520 and the Echo PB-255LN.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Echo PB-2520	Echo PB-255LN

Higher CFM Lighter Bigger fuel tank	Higher MPH Less noisy
Buy on Amazon	Buy on Amazon

Feel, Fuel & Noise

Manufactured by Echo, both the PB-2520 and the PB-255LN should uphold similar standards of quality and attention to detail.

These two products are handheld blowers and therefore provide you with superior mobility.
gas-powered blowers, both products offer a dependable power source that can be refilled quickly, allowing you the mobility to cover extensive outdoor spaces without interruption.
The heavier Echo PB-255LN, weighing 10.2 lbs, surpasses the 8.8 lbs of the Echo PB-2520, requiring more effort to maneuver and resulting in increased fatigue during prolonged use.
The noise rating of the Echo PB-2520 at 70 dB exceeds that of the Echo PB-255LN at 64 dB. Consequently, opting for the Echo PB-255LN may provide a more comfortable experience for both you and your neighbors.

CFM & MPH

When compared, the Echo PB-2520 demonstrates a CFM of 453, surpassing the 354 CFM of the Echo PB-255LN, establishing it as the more powerful tool for swiftly clearing leaves from your yard.
The Echo PB-255LN's MPH of 191 beats the 170 MPH of the Echo PB-2520. It therefore expels air faster and should aid you blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris (acorns, etc.) and wet leaves more effectively.

Engine specs

The Echo PB-2520 boasts a slightly larger fuel tank, holding 18.6 fl.oz., in contrast to the 16.9 fl.oz. of the Echo PB-255LN. This allows for longer operation and fewer interruptions for refueling, particularly beneficial if the engines have comparable fuel consumption rates.
The engine displacement of 25.4 cc in both products indicates similar fuel consumption per stroke, potentially leading to equivalent performance capabilities. With 2-stroke engines, both leaf blowers mandate an oil/fuel mix as part of their operation.