WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.
Echo PB-2620 vs PB-2520 - The Differences
Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Echo PB-2520 and the Echo PB-2620.
But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:
| Echo PB-2520 | Echo PB-2620 |
|---|---|
 |  |
|
|
| Buy on Amazon | Buy on Amazon |
Feel, Fuel & Noise
Belonging to the line of Echo blowers, both the PB-2520 and the PB-2620 should have a shared standard of manufacturing and attention to detail.
- Handling: Since both products are handheld blowers, they offer excellent mobility for your convenience.
- Power Source: Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.
- Weight: Weighing 9.7 lbs, the Echo PB-2620 tips the scales slightly above the 8.8 lbs of the Echo PB-2520, implying that while it's marginally heavier, users may still experience a touch more convenience in operation.
- Noise: With a noise rating of 70 dB for both devices, you can expect them to be equally considerate of your neighbors and equally comfortable for you to use.
CFM & MPH
- CFM: With a marginal CFM advantage (456 vs 453 CFM), the Echo PB-2620 may offer a modest edge over the Echo PB-2520 (453 CFM) in terms of leaf-moving capability.
- MPH: The Echo PB-2620 with an MPH of 172 slightly exceeds the 170 MPH of the Echo PB-2520. Thus, in comparison, the former expels air at a slightly higher speed, and should do a better job at blowing leaves on grass or lifting wet leaves and debris (acorns, etc.).
Engine specs
- Fuel Tank: The Echo PB-2620's larger fuel tank, holding 20.3 fl.oz., has the potential to provide longer usage periods, assuming similar engine efficiency to the Echo PB-2520.
- Engine: Both products boast an engine displacement of 25.4cc, hinting at similar fuel consumption rates per stroke and potentially yielding comparable performance outcomes. Both leaf blowers come with 2-cycle engines, which necessitate an oil/fuel mix for operation.
Other features
- Vacuum Ability: Both the Echo PB-2520 and the Echo PB-2620 lack leaf vacuuming features, meaning you'll need to employ another method for leaf collection.
TL;DR
| Echo PB-2520 | Echo PB-2620 |
|---|---|
| |
|
|
| Buy on Amazon | Buy on Amazon |
Thank you and this video well done! You didn’t mention weight…small difference in weight on them, but w extra gas plus extra weight, one might want to know that for their needs. Above all I want to tell you your video is really good and helped me make my decision (I am replacing one similar to the 2520, which worked great for me 15 years) but borrowed a blower similar to the 2620 and loved that base handle but I also felt the heavier weight, so a factor to think about. YES refilling the gas tank seemed too often on the old one…so the larger tank is a plus for me.
Bobby is almost right, PB-2620 has a 2 ring piston and a chrome plated cylinder for longer life.
PB-2520 has a 1 ring piston and standard cylinder.
pb2620 has 2 ring chrome piston
pb2520 has 1 ring aluminum piston
I think