Echo PB-255LN VS PB-2620 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the Echo PB-255LN and the Echo PB-2620.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

Echo PB-255LN	Echo PB-2620

Higher MPH Less noisy Slighlty less expensive	Higher CFM Lighter Bigger fuel tank
Buy on Amazon	Buy on Amazon
Show all offers	Show all offers

Common specs comparison

As the PB-255LN and the PB-2620 are both Echo blowers, they benefit from the same level of quality and attention to detail.
Being handheld blowers, these two products ensure exceptional mobility while in use.
gas-powered blowers, both products offer a dependable power source that can be refilled quickly, allowing you the mobility to cover extensive outdoor spaces without interruption.

The Echo PB-2620, boasting a CFM of 456, clearly outperforms the 354 CFM of the Echo PB-255LN. With this higher CFM, the Echo PB-2620 promises a vastly improved leaf blowing capability, allowing you to tackle larger areas with ease.
With an MPH of 191, the Echo PB-255LN edges out the 172 MPH of the Echo PB-2620, potentially improving its performance in leaf blowing and debris lifting tasks.

The Echo PB-255LN, weighing 10.2 lbs, edges slightly above the 9.7 lbs of the Echo PB-2620, implying that while it's marginally heavier, you may notice a tad more comfort and ease in handling the latter.
With a noise rating of 70 dB, the Echo PB-2620 exceeds the 64 dB rating of the Echo PB-255LN. Consequently, selecting the Echo PB-255LN might ensure a more peaceful atmosphere for both you and your neighbors.

The Echo PB-2620 boasts a larger fuel tank capacity, with 20.3 fl.oz., surpassing the 16.9 fl.oz. of the Echo PB-255LN. Consequently, you can store more fuel, potentially extending operational time, assuming similar engine fuel consumption rates.
Both products boast an engine displacement of 25.4cc, hinting at similar fuel consumption rates per stroke and potentially yielding comparable performance outcomes.
These leaf blowers are both powered by 2-cycle engines, requiring an oil/fuel mix to function.