RedMax EBZ7500 VS EBZ8500 - Spec & Feature Comparison

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the RedMax EBZ7500 and the RedMax EBZ8500.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

RedMax EBZ7500	RedMax EBZ8500 (DISCONTINUED)

Higher MPH Lighter	Higher CFM Bigger fuel tank Bigger engine
$569.99 on eBay

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

Belonging to the line of RedMax blowers, both the EBZ7500 and the EBZ8500 should have a shared standard of manufacturing and attention to detail. With a hip throttle on both products, you'll find it more comfortable to operate them for longer durations, easing the strain on your right hand.
Designed as backpack blowers, both products boast substantial engines and sizable fuel tanks, making them easy to carry for extended periods.
Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.

CFM & MPH

In contrast, the RedMax EBZ8500, with its CFM of 908, outperforms the 768 CFM of the RedMax EBZ7500, making it the preferred option for efficiently blowing leaves away.
The RedMax EBZ7500's MPH of 236 beats the 206 MPH of the RedMax EBZ8500. It therefore expels air faster and should aid you blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris (acorns, etc.) and wet leaves more effectively.

Weight & Noise rating

The weight of the RedMax EBZ8500, at 24.7 lbs, slightly exceeds that of the 23.4 lbs RedMax EBZ7500, which means you may experience slightly less fatigue and find it easier to maneuver during prolonged use.
With a noise rating of 103 dB for both devices, you can expect them to be equally considerate of your neighbors and equally comfortable for you to use.

Engine specs comparison

The RedMax EBZ8500 boasts a slightly larger fuel tank, holding 77.7 fl.oz., in contrast to the 71 fl.oz. of the RedMax EBZ7500. This allows for longer operation and fewer interruptions for refueling, particularly beneficial if the engines have comparable fuel consumption rates.
In comparison, the engine displacement of the RedMax EBZ7500, at 65.6cc, falls short of the 75.6cc of the RedMax EBZ8500. This indicates that the latter might consume more fuel per stroke, thereby potentially delivering greater power.
Both of these leaf blowers are equipped with 2-cycle engines, meaning they require an oil/fuel mix for operation.