WE ARE PROUD TO BE INDEPENDENT AND IN NO WAY ASSOCIATED WITH MANUFACTURERS. TO STAY UNBIASED, WE DO NOT ACCEPT FREE PRODUCTS. WE EARN FROM ADVERTISING FEES PAID BY RETAILERS ON QUALIFYING PURCHASES.

RedMax EBZ8500 vs EBZ7500 - The differences

Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the RedMax EBZ7500 and the RedMax EBZ8500.

But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:

RedMax EBZ7500RedMax EBZ8500
(DISCONTINUED)
RedMax EBZ7500RedMax EBZ8500
  • Higher MPH
  • Lighter
  • Higher CFM
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Bigger engine

Common specs comparison

Make & handling

  • Belonging to the line of RedMax blowers, both the EBZ7500 and the EBZ8500 should have a shared standard of manufacturing and attention to detail. Featuring a hip throttle design, both products are crafted for extended use, ensuring reduced fatigue on your right hand over time.
  • Designed as backpack blowers, both products boast substantial engines and sizable fuel tanks, making them easy to carry for extended periods.
  • Both products are gas-powered blowers, providing a reliable power source that can be refilled in seconds, granting you the flexibility to navigate through expansive outdoor areas effortlessly.

CFM & MPH

  • In comparison, the RedMax EBZ8500, with a CFM of 908, beats the 768 CFM of the RedMax EBZ7500, making it the superior landscaping tool of the two, when it comes to the amount of leaves that can be blown per minute.
  • With an MPH of 236, the RedMax EBZ7500 moderately surpasses the 206 MPH of the RedMax EBZ8500, offering slightly superior airspeed for enhanced performance in blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris and wet leaves.

Weight & Noise rating

  • Weighing 24.7 lbs, the RedMax EBZ8500 tips the scales slightly above the 23.4 lbs of the RedMax EBZ7500, implying that while it's marginally heavier, users may still experience a touch more convenience in operation.
  • Both devices have a noise rating of 103 dB, ensuring they would neither cause significantly more disturbance to neighbors than the other, nor be noticeably louder to the operator's ears.

Engine specs comparison

  • The RedMax EBZ8500 boasts a slightly larger fuel tank, holding 77.7 fl.oz., in contrast to the 71 fl.oz. of the RedMax EBZ7500. This allows for longer operation and fewer interruptions for refueling, particularly beneficial if the engines have comparable fuel consumption rates.
  • In comparison, the engine displacement of the RedMax EBZ7500, at 65.6cc, falls short of the 75.6cc of the RedMax EBZ8500. This indicates that the latter might consume more fuel per stroke, thereby potentially delivering greater power.
  • With 2-cycle engines, both leaf blowers mandate an oil/fuel mix as part of their operation.

Other features comparison

Vacuum ability

With no leaf vacuuming functionality in either the RedMax EBZ7500 or the RedMax EBZ8500, you'll have to find another way to gather leaves.

TL;DR

RedMax EBZ7500RedMax EBZ8500
(DISCONTINUED)
RedMax EBZ7500RedMax EBZ8500
  • Higher MPH
  • Lighter
  • Higher CFM
  • Bigger fuel tank
  • Bigger engine
We would love to know your opinion

Comment this comparison

Leaf Blower Guide
Logo
Compare items
  • Total (0)
Compare

You can compare as many blowers as you wish. However, for the best results, we recommend you to compare only 2 blowers at a time.

0