Further down the page, you'll find some explanations regarding the key similarities and differences between the RedMax EBZ7500 and the RedMax EBZ8550.
But before checking out these explanations, here's a table that summarizes the main pros of each of these 2 leaf blowers:
RedMax EBZ7500 | RedMax EBZ8550 |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Buy on Amazon | Buy on Amazon |
Show all offers | Show all offers |
Common specs comparison
Make & handling
- As the EBZ7500 and the EBZ8550 are both RedMax blowers, they benefit from the same level of quality and attention to detail. Both products have a hip throttle, which can make it easier on your right hand if you operate them over an extended period of time.
- These two products are constructed as backpack blowers, allowing you to comfortably carry their powerful engines and massive fuel tanks.
- Both products are gas-powered blowers - gas is a reliable power source which you can refill in a matter of seconds.
CFM & MPH
- In comparison, the RedMax EBZ8550, with a CFM of 941, beats the 768 CFM of the RedMax EBZ7500, making it the superior landscaping tool of the two, when it comes to the amount of leaves that can be blown per minute.
- The RedMax EBZ7500's MPH of 236 beats the 206 MPH of the RedMax EBZ8550. It therefore expels air faster and should aid you blowing leaves on grass or lifting heavy debris (acorns, etc.) and wet leaves more effectively.
Weight & Noise rating
- The weight of the RedMax EBZ8550, which is 25.1 lbs, slightly exceeds the 23.4 lbs of the RedMax EBZ7500, and will therefore require you to carry around slightly more weight.
- Both devices have a noise rating of 103 dB. They should therefore be equally demanding on the ears.
Engine specs comparison
- The RedMax EBZ8550 has a slightly larger fuel tank, with the volume of 77.8 fl.oz., compared to the 71 fl.oz. of the RedMax EBZ7500. Thus, it can store more fuel and you may theoretically operate it for slightly longer, if their engines had the same fuel requirements.
- When compared, the RedMax EBZ7500's engine displacement at 65.6cc is lesser than the 75.6cc of the RedMax EBZ8550. Therefore, the second may consume more fuel per stroke and is in turn be more powerful.
- Each of these leaf blowers features a 2-cycle engine. Thus, they both require you to have an oil/fuel mix to operate.
Other features comparison
Vacuum ability
Neither the RedMax EBZ7500 nor the RedMax EBZ8550 has the ability to vacuum leaves. Thus, you will require another method of leaf collection.
TL;DR
RedMax EBZ7500 | RedMax EBZ8550 |
---|---|
![]() | ![]() |
|
|
Buy on Amazon | Buy on Amazon |
Show all offers | Show all offers |